↓ Skip to main content

339 血液透析患者と心胸比(CTR)の精度管理(X線検査 単純撮影)

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
339 血液透析患者と心胸比(CTR)の精度管理(X線検査 単純撮影)
Published in
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi, January 2003
DOI 10.6009/jjrt.kj00000922210
Authors

本間 暁大, 渡辺 東, 大沼 孝司, 三浦 康成, 石川 辰美, 木村 真, 藤村 仁

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#17,636,985
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi
#106
of 215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,132
of 139,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.