↓ Skip to main content

Is the evolution metaphor still necessary or even useful for genetic programming?

Overview of attention for article published in Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 125)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is the evolution metaphor still necessary or even useful for genetic programming?
Published in
Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, November 2023
DOI 10.1007/s10710-023-09469-9
Authors

Jason H. Moore

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,639,893
of 24,858,211 outputs
Outputs from Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
#34
of 125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,413
of 163,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,858,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them