↓ Skip to main content

Safety and Immunogenicity of Bivalent RSVpreF Vaccine Coadministered With Seasonal Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Older Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
33 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Safety and Immunogenicity of Bivalent RSVpreF Vaccine Coadministered With Seasonal Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Older Adults
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, November 2023
DOI 10.1093/cid/ciad707
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugene Athan, James Baber, Karen Quan, Robert J Scott, Anna Jaques, Qin Jiang, Wen Li, David Cooper, Mark W Cutler, Elena V Kalinina, Annaliesa S Anderson, Kena A Swanson, William C Gruber, Alejandra Gurtman, Beate Schmoele-Thoma, Christopher Argent, Mark Arya, Eugene Athan, Paul Bird, Mark Bloch, Sheetal Bull, David Colquhoun, Gustinna De Silva, Sachin Deshmukh, Peter Eizenberg, Christopher Gilfillan, Elizabeth Gunner, Valerie Hiew, Amber Leah, Indika Leelasena, Jason Lickliter, Anthony McGirr, Rahul Mohan, Claire Morbey, Louise Murdoch, Mark Nelson, A Munro Neville, Matthew O'Sullivan, Christopher Rook, Marc Russo, Philip Ryan, Robert Scott, Sze Tai, Florence Tiong, Olga Voloshyna, Peter Wark

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 13%
Researcher 5 13%
Lecturer 2 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 21 54%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Chemistry 2 5%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 22 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2025.
All research outputs
#633,286
of 34,357,314 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#1,103
of 21,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,750
of 454,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#14
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,357,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.