↓ Skip to main content

Improving Treadmill Performance in Patients with Lumbar Stenosis

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Improving Treadmill Performance in Patients with Lumbar Stenosis
Published in
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, July 2013
DOI 10.1097/phm.0b013e3182971321
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Weiner, Doug Johnson-Greene, Ronald Tolchin, Lauren Abratt, Brian Frank

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate a custom angle load reduction rolling walker to determine the relationship between flexion and load reduction on walking performance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.The hypothesis was that walking performance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis would be significantly improved using the Oliver Static Measuring Apparatus device compared with unaided treadmill walking.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Student > Master 5 15%
Other 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Psychology 3 9%
Sports and Recreations 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 15 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#1,923
of 2,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,446
of 206,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#23
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.