↓ Skip to main content

Patients’ and GPs’ views and expectations of home monitoring with a pulse oximeter: A process evaluation of a pilot randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Patients’ and GPs’ views and expectations of home monitoring with a pulse oximeter: A process evaluation of a pilot randomized controlled trial
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, October 2023
DOI 10.3399/bjgp.2023.0139
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karin Smit, Roderick P Venekamp, Geert-Jan Geersing, Frans H Rutten, Lisette Schoonhoven, Dorien LM Zwart

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 50%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 50%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2023.
All research outputs
#17,129,493
of 25,166,481 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#3,708
of 4,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,330
of 345,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#61
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,166,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.