↓ Skip to main content

Comparison between optical coherence tomography-guided and intravascular ultrasound-guided primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in Fujita Medical Journal, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison between optical coherence tomography-guided and intravascular ultrasound-guided primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
Published in
Fujita Medical Journal, November 2023
DOI 10.20407/fmj.2023-006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuji Matsuwaki, Takashi Muramatsu, Yukio Ozaki, Takashi Uwatoko, Takuo Toriya, Hidemaro Takatsu, Yu Yoshiki, Masataka Yoshinaga, Masato Ishikawa, Masaya Ohota, Hideaki Ota, Hideo Izawa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#16,927,921
of 24,891,087 outputs
Outputs from Fujita Medical Journal
#9
of 48 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,611
of 164,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fujita Medical Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,891,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one scored the same or higher as 39 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them