↓ Skip to main content

Are cash-for-work programmes good for local economic growth? The case of donor-funded public works for refugees and nationals in Jordan

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Development Studies, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are cash-for-work programmes good for local economic growth? The case of donor-funded public works for refugees and nationals in Jordan
Published in
Canadian Journal of Development Studies, November 2023
DOI 10.1080/02255189.2023.2268806
Authors

Markus Loewe, Tina Zintl

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,654,971
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Development Studies
#80
of 456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,646
of 349,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Development Studies
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 456 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.