You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Description of the fifth sea pen species that attaches to hard substrates by modifying its peduncle
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Deep-Sea Research Part I, Oceanographic Research Papers, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.dsr.2023.104212 |
| Authors |
Yuka Kushida, Hiroki Kise, Akira Iguchi, Yoshihiro Fujiwara, Shinji Tsuchida |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Scientists | 4 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 308. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#111,931
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from Deep-Sea Research Part I, Oceanographic Research Papers
#4
of 2,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,558
of 340,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Deep-Sea Research Part I, Oceanographic Research Papers
#1
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.