An intraoperative adverse event (iAE) is often directly attributable to the surgeon's technical error and/or suboptimal intraoperative judgment. We aimed to examine the psychological impact of iAEs on surgeons as well as the surgeons' attitude regarding iAE reporting.
We conducted a web-based cross-sectional survey of all surgeons at three major teaching hospitals of the same university. The 29-item questionnaire was developed using a systematic closed and open approach focused on assessing the surgeons' 1) personal account of iAE incidence, 2) emotional response to iAEs, 3) available support systems and 4) perspective regarding the barriers to iAE reporting.
The response rate was 44.8% (n=126). The mean respondents' age was 49 years, 77% were male, and 83% performed >150 procedures/year. Over the last year, 32% recalled 1 iAE, 39% 2-5 iAEs, and 9% >6 iAEs. The emotional toll of iAEs was significant, with 84% of respondents reporting a combination of anxiety (66%), guilt (60%), sadness (52%), shame/embarrassment (42%) and anger (29%). Colleagues constituted the most helpful support system (42%), rather than friends or family; a few surgeons needed psychological therapy/counseling. Regarding reporting, 26% preferred not to see their individual iAE rates, while 38% wanted it reported in comparison to their aggregate colleagues' rate. The most common barriers to reporting iAEs were fear of litigation (50%), lack of a standardized reporting system (49%), and the absence of a clear iAE definition (48%).
iAEs occur often, have a significant negative impact on surgeons' wellbeing, and barriers to transparency are fear of litigation and absence of a well-defined reporting system. Efforts should be made to support surgeons and standardize reporting when iAEs occur.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2025.
All research outputs
#891,315
of 33,201,260 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Surgeons
#265
of 5,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,626
of 456,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Surgeons
#6
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,201,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
