↓ Skip to main content

Is attempting to change marine mammal behaviour a generic solution to the bycatch problem? A dugong case study

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Conservation, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Is attempting to change marine mammal behaviour a generic solution to the bycatch problem? A dugong case study
Published in
Animal Conservation, April 2007
DOI 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2007.00104.x
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Italy 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Jersey 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
French Guiana 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 145 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 17%
Other 17 11%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 88 55%
Environmental Science 35 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Engineering 2 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 23 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,941,765
of 26,485,222 outputs
Outputs from Animal Conservation
#889
of 1,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,343
of 87,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Conservation
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,485,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.