You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Novel Method to Determine Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Using a Physics‐Based Synthetic Earthquake Catalog: A New Zealand Case Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: SOLID EARTH, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1029/2023jb027207 |
| Authors |
Laura Hughes, William Power, Emily M. Lane, Martha K. Savage, Richard Arnold, Andrew Howell, Bruce Shaw, Bill Fry, Andrew Nicol |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 29% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 29% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 14% |
| Engineering | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 188. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#211,439
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: SOLID EARTH
#26
of 2,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,210
of 349,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: SOLID EARTH
#3
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.