↓ Skip to main content

Inhibitory suppression of heterogeneously tuned excitation enhances spatial coding in CA1 place cells

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
338 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Inhibitory suppression of heterogeneously tuned excitation enhances spatial coding in CA1 place cells
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, January 2017
DOI 10.1038/nn.4486
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Place cells in the CA1 region of the hippocampus express location-specific firing despite receiving a steady barrage of heterogeneously tuned excitatory inputs that should compromise output dynamic range and timing. We examined the role of synaptic inhibition in countering the deleterious effects of off-target excitation. Intracellular recordings in behaving mice demonstrate that bimodal excitation drives place cells, while unimodal excitation drives weaker or no spatial tuning in interneurons. Optogenetic hyperpolarization of interneurons had spatially uniform effects on place cell membrane potential dynamics, substantially reducing spatial selectivity. These data and a computational model suggest that spatially uniform inhibitory conductance enhances rate coding in place cells by suppressing out-of-field excitation and by limiting dendritic amplification. Similarly, we observed that inhibitory suppression of phasic noise generated by out-of-field excitation enhances temporal coding by expanding the range of theta phase precession. Thus, spatially uniform inhibition allows proficient and flexible coding in hippocampal CA1 by suppressing heterogeneously tuned excitation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 338 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 331 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 30%
Researcher 65 19%
Student > Master 30 9%
Student > Bachelor 20 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 42 12%
Unknown 64 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 138 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 26%
Engineering 9 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 2%
Psychology 7 2%
Other 19 6%
Unknown 70 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2026.
All research outputs
#3,924,567
of 32,525,004 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#3,439
of 6,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,493
of 454,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#57
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,525,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 60.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.