↓ Skip to main content

Tenacious D: Symbiodinium in clade D remain in reef corals at both high and low temperature extremes despite impairment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Biology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Tenacious D: Symbiodinium in clade D remain in reef corals at both high and low temperature extremes despite impairment
Published in
Journal of Experimental Biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1242/jeb.148239
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Reef corals are sensitive to thermal stress, which induces coral bleaching (the loss of algal symbionts), often leading to coral mortality. However, corals hosting certain symbionts (notably Symbiodinium in clade D) resist bleaching when exposed to high temperatures. To determine if these symbionts are also cold tolerant, we exposed corals hosting either Symbiodinium C3 or D1a to incremental warming (+1°C week(-1) to 35°C) and cooling (-1°C week(-1) to 15°C), and measured photodamage and symbiont loss. During warming to 33°C, C3-corals were photodamaged and lost >99% of symbionts, while D1a-corals experienced photodamage but did not bleach. During cooling, D1a-corals suffered more photodamage than C3-corals but still did not bleach, while C3-corals lost 94% of symbionts. These results indicate that photodamage does not always lead to bleaching, suggesting alternate mechanisms exist by which symbionts resist bleaching, and helping explain the persistence of D1a symbionts on recently-bleached reefs, with implications for the future of these ecosystems.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 223 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 20%
Student > Bachelor 33 15%
Researcher 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 4%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 52 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 35%
Environmental Science 42 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 <1%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 60 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,492,095
of 27,791,244 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Biology
#1,366
of 9,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,219
of 423,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Biology
#52
of 338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,791,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.