↓ Skip to main content

Acid-sensing ion channels in pain and disease

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
patent
12 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
2 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
508 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Acid-sensing ion channels in pain and disease
Published in
Nature Reviews Neuroscience, June 2013
DOI 10.1038/nrn3529
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Why do neurons sense extracellular acid? In large part, this question has driven increasing investigation on acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) in the CNS and the peripheral nervous system for the past two decades. Significant progress has been made in understanding the structure and function of ASICs at the molecular level. Studies aimed at clarifying their physiological importance have suggested roles for ASICs in pain, neurological and psychiatric disease. This Review highlights recent findings linking these channels to physiology and disease. In addition, it discusses some of the implications for therapy and points out questions that remain unanswered.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 508 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 495 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 105 21%
Researcher 82 16%
Student > Bachelor 63 12%
Student > Master 42 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 7%
Other 80 16%
Unknown 101 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 108 21%
Neuroscience 71 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 62 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 54 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 5%
Other 67 13%
Unknown 122 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2026.
All research outputs
#1,775,411
of 31,990,159 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#764
of 2,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,823
of 231,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#8
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,990,159 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.