↓ Skip to main content

Acidity of M(VI)O2(OH)2 for M = Group 6, 16, and U as Central Atoms

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physical Chemistry A, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Acidity of M(VI)O2(OH)2 for M = Group 6, 16, and U as Central Atoms
Published in
Journal of Physical Chemistry A, January 2017
DOI 10.1021/acs.jpca.6b11889
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Gas phase acidities and aqueous solution pKa's are predicted for MO2(OH)2 where center atom M is a main group 6, 16 and U atom using the Feller-Peterson-Dixon approach based on coupled cluster CCSD(T) calculations with additional corrections. The gas phase acidities of the MO2(OH)2 compounds are essentially the same for elements (M) of the same group, 304 - 310 kcal/mol at 298 K. All of the Group 6 compounds are 5 to 6 kcal/mol less acidic in the gas phase than H2SO4. The gas phase acidity of UO2(OH)2 is calculated to be up to 338.0 kcal/mol, ~10% less acidic in the gas phase than the other MO2(OH)2 acids. The most acidic molecule in aqueous solution is predicted to be H2SO4. Overall, for the Group 16 compounds, the pKas increase going down the group with H2PoO4 predicted to be slightly more acidic than nitric acid. H2CrO4 is the most acidic of the Group 6 transition metal compounds. The aqueous acidities of H2MoO4 and H2WO4 are comparable and about 3 pKa units less acidic than H2CrO4, and comparable in acidity to HNO3. H2UO4 is not acidic at all in aqueous solution with a pKa near 20 pKa units and is also not predicted to readily undergo hydrolysis reactions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 43%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 29%
Other 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 9 64%
Environmental Science 2 14%
Chemical Engineering 1 7%
Materials Science 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2017.
All research outputs
#24,783,232
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physical Chemistry A
#6,062
of 12,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,751
of 468,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physical Chemistry A
#53
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,170 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 468,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.