↓ Skip to main content

Unleashing the power of anti-CD20 immunotherapy: Mitigating multiple sclerosis risk in Epstein-Barr virus latent infections.

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 658)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unleashing the power of anti-CD20 immunotherapy: Mitigating multiple sclerosis risk in Epstein-Barr virus latent infections.
Published in
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, December 2023
DOI 10.17219/acem/172240
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reem Hamoud Alrashoudi

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory, demyelinating, and neurodegenerative connective tissue disease affecting the central nervous system (CNS). Recently, there has been a dramatic improvement in several vital concepts of immune pathophysiology underlying MS. Notably, one of the prerequisites to MS development is Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. Greater attention has been drawn towards promising, innovative immunotherapies in the management and treatment of MS. Whilst there are numerous immunotherapies currently proposed for MS, the B cell depleting therapy that predominantly uses the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) such as rituximab, ocrelizumab, and ofatumumab have demonstrated promising clinical benefits by targeting the memory B cells, which are the primary reservoir of EBV latency. Although mAbs have proved beneficial in the treatment of MS, they pose the risk of potential adverse effects. The current systematic review was undertaken to explore the therapeutic role of anti-CD20 therapy and its downsides in the treatment of MS and EBV infection. Clinical trials and prospective and retrospective studies reporting anti-CD20 therapy were carefully reviewed. The initial sections discuss the clinical features of MS, the probable link between EBV and MS, and the role of B cells in MS pathogenesis. Here, we show the potential role of anti-CD20 therapy more of a boon than a bane as the therapy yields more promising results for MS treatment. Nevertheless, the adverse effects could be minimized following a planned therapeutic regimen for treating MS patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,624,428
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
#12
of 658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,838
of 360,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 658 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them