↓ Skip to main content

宮地・加藤・森・森下・渋谷・北沢著「動物生態学」書評

Overview of attention for article published in JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 251)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
宮地・加藤・森・森下・渋谷・北沢著「動物生態学」書評
Published in
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, April 2017
DOI 10.18960/seitai.12.4_157
Authors

東 幹夫, 原田 英司, 石黒 俊夫, 伊沢 紘生, 川那部 浩哉, 牧 岩男, 名越 誠, 須永 哲雄, 高松 史朗, 竹田 瑠美子, 友田 淑郎, 柳島 静江, 水田 国康, 村上 興正, 中村 央, 西垣 定治郎, 佐藤 安夫, 辻 英明, 森 主一

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,960,976
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
#11
of 251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,407
of 325,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.