You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
生駒駅前商店街における中心市街地活性化の運営の変遷と継承の要因に関する研究
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. D3 (Infrastructure Planning and Management), January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2208/jscejipm.69.i_363 |
| Authors |
依藤 光代, 松村 暢彦 |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. D3 (Infrastructure Planning and Management)
#20
of 138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,372
of 289,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. D3 (Infrastructure Planning and Management)
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.