You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
術後の病理検査で尿管損傷が発覚し自家腎移植を行った一例と尿管損傷修復アルゴリズム
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nippon Hinyōkika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.5980/jpnjurol.113.147 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akane Kinoshita, Daisuke Yamada, Kazuki Honda, Tetsuya Danno, Mayuko Tokunaga, Jimpei Miyakawa, Satoru Taguchi, Yoshiyuki Akiyama, Yuta Yamada, Yusuke Sato, Haruki Kume |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Hinyōkika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology
#126
of 204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,003
of 364,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Hinyōkika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them