↓ Skip to main content

Short-Acting β-Agonist Use As a Marker of Current Asthma Control

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Short-Acting β-Agonist Use As a Marker of Current Asthma Control
Published in
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, June 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.04.008
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The relationship between current asthma symptoms and rescue bronchodilator (reliever) use is uncertain, leading to different recommendations about the preferred reliever metric to use when assessing asthma control. In a 6-month randomized controlled trial of combination budesonide/formoterol as maintenance and reliever therapy versus combination budesonide/formoterol as maintenance treatment with albuterol as reliever, we measured inhaler use by electronic monitoring.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 18 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 47%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 18 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,177,112
of 27,777,630 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
#1,812
of 4,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,378
of 216,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,777,630 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.