↓ Skip to main content

鈍的頚部外傷を契機とした甲状腺腫瘍破裂に伴う頚部血腫を来した外傷性甲状腺損傷の1例

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japanese Association for the Surgery of Trauma, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
鈍的頚部外傷を契機とした甲状腺腫瘍破裂に伴う頚部血腫を来した外傷性甲状腺損傷の1例
Published in
Journal of the Japanese Association for the Surgery of Trauma, January 2024
DOI 10.11382/jjast.38.1_04
Authors

杉井 将崇, 柄澤 智史, 大戸 弘人, 福田 伸樹, 藤森 大輔, 伊藤 史生, 小山 知秀, 高橋 功

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Association for the Surgery of Trauma
#13
of 17 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,306
of 355,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Association for the Surgery of Trauma
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them