↓ Skip to main content

Determining the optimal time interval between sample acquisition and cryopreservation when processing immature testicular tissue to preserve fertility

Overview of attention for article published in Cryobiology, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determining the optimal time interval between sample acquisition and cryopreservation when processing immature testicular tissue to preserve fertility
Published in
Cryobiology, December 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2023.104841
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shiyan Tang, Celine Jones, Jill Davies, Sheila Lane, Rod T Mitchell, Kevin Coward

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,310,010
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Cryobiology
#312
of 1,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,142
of 341,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cryobiology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them