You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
高校野球選手におけるCOVID-19感染拡大防止措置が実施された年と実施されなかった年の傷害発生率の比較研究
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Athletic Training, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.24692/jsatj.9.1_49 |
| Authors |
網代 広宣, 小林 雄也, 平田 昂大, 板野 圭佑, 佐藤 慎也, 酒井 直也, 仲島 佑紀 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2023.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Athletic Training
#27
of 44 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,717
of 366,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Athletic Training
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one scored the same or higher as 17 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them