↓ Skip to main content

研究資料 算数・数学教育の現代化

Overview of attention for article published in Journal for Historical Studies in Mathematical Education, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
研究資料 算数・数学教育の現代化
Published in
Journal for Historical Studies in Mathematical Education, December 2023
DOI 10.51012/jshsme.23.0_13
Authors

片桐 重男, 蒔苗 直道

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2023.
All research outputs
#15,840,332
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Historical Studies in Mathematical Education
#4
of 10 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,971
of 365,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Historical Studies in Mathematical Education
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.