You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Neoadjuvant Therapy for Nonmetastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials, December 2023
|
DOI | 10.1097/coc.0000000000001076 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Krishan R. Jethwa, Ed Kim, Jordan Berlin, Christopher J. Anker, Leila Tchelebi, Gerard Abood, Christopher L. Hallemeier, Salma Jabbour, Timothy Kennedy, Rachit Kumar, Percy Lee, Navesh Sharma, William Small, Vonetta Williams, Suzanne Russo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 17% |
India | 3 | 13% |
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
Philippines | 1 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Taiwan | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 57% |
Scientists | 7 | 30% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,530,707
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials
#39
of 1,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,781
of 356,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,758 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them