↓ Skip to main content

Insights into the Distinct Mechanisms of Action of Taxane and Non-Taxane Microtubule Stabilizers from Cryo-EM Structures

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Biology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Insights into the Distinct Mechanisms of Action of Taxane and Non-Taxane Microtubule Stabilizers from Cryo-EM Structures
Published in
Journal of Molecular Biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.01.001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A number of microtubule-stabilizing agents have demonstrated or predicted potential as anticancer agents, but a detailed structural basis for their mechanism of action is still lacking. We have obtained high-resolution (3.9-4.2Å) cryo-EM reconstructions of microtubules stabilized by the taxane-site binders Taxol and zampanolide, and by peloruside, which targets a distinct, non-taxoid pocket on β-tubulin. We find that each molecule has unique distinct structural effects on the microtubule lattice structure. Peloruside acts primarily at lateral contacts and has an effect on the "seam" of heterologous interactions, enforcing a conformation more similar to that of homologous (i.e. non-seam) contacts by which it regularizes the microtubule lattice. In contrast, binding of either Taxol or zampanolide induces microtubule heterogeneity. In doubly-bound microtubules, peloruside overrides the heterogeneity induced by Taxol-binding. Our structural analysis illustrates distinct mechanisms of these drugs for stabilizing the microtubule lattice, and is of relevance to the possible use of combinations of microtubule-stabilizing agents to regulate microtubules activity and improve therapeutic potential.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 221 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 22%
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Master 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 75 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 24%
Chemistry 26 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 75 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,137,230
of 32,403,885 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Biology
#1,242
of 13,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,019
of 451,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Biology
#7
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,403,885 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.