↓ Skip to main content

Solar wind dynamic pressure and electric field as the main factors controlling Saturn's aurorae

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Solar wind dynamic pressure and electric field as the main factors controlling Saturn's aurorae
Published in
Nature, February 2005
DOI 10.1038/nature03333
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 4%
Japan 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 63 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 24%
Student > Master 8 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 36 53%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 13 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,634,351
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#68,902
of 99,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,210
of 162,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#250
of 406 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 406 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.