↓ Skip to main content

Increased ENaC-mediated liquid absorption across vitamin-D deficient human airway epithelia

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Increased ENaC-mediated liquid absorption across vitamin-D deficient human airway epithelia
Published in
American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology, December 2023
DOI 10.1152/ajpcell.00369.2023
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Vitamin D deficiency is a risk factor for exacerbation of obstructive airway disease, a hallmark of which is mucus dehydration and plugging. Calcitriol (the active form of vitamin D) deficiency in cultured human airway epithelia resulted in increased SCNN1G and ATP1B1 mRNAs encoding subunits of ENaC and the Na-K pump compared to supplemented epithelia. These drive absorption of airway surface liquid. Consistently, calcitriol-deficient epithelia absorbed liquid faster than supplemented epithelia. Calcitriol-deficiency also increased amiloride-sensitive Isc and Gt without altering Na-K pump activity, indicating the changes in amiloride-sensitivity arose from ENaC. ENaC activity can be regulated by trafficking, proteases, and channel abundance. We found the effect was likely not induced by changes to endocytosis of ENaC given that calcitriol did not affect the half-lives of amiloride-sensitive Isc and Gt. Further, trypsin nominally increased Isc produced by epithelia ± calcitriol, suggesting calcitriol did not affect proteolytic activation of ENaC. Consistent with mRNA and functional data, calcitriol deficiency resulted in increased γENaC protein. These data indicate that the vitamin D receptor response controls ENaC function and subsequent liquid absorption, providing insight into the relationship between vitamin D deficiency and respiratory disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 100%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 50%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2023.
All research outputs
#28,633,246
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology
#4,340
of 4,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#331,322
of 445,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology
#65
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.