↓ Skip to main content

Identification of KIT activating mutations in paediatric solitary mastocytoma

Overview of attention for article published in Histopathology, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Identification of KIT activating mutations in paediatric solitary mastocytoma
Published in
Histopathology, October 2013
DOI 10.1111/his.12212
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Mastocytosis is an abnormal mast cell proliferation involving one or more organs, in particular the skin and bone marrow. In children, disease is usually limited to the skin, with three distinct clinical presentations: urticaria pigmentosa, diffuse cutaneous mastocytosis and solitary mastocytoma. Although the KIT D816V mutation is typically found in adult-onset mastocytosis, it is less commonly seen in childhood-onset mastocytosis, and the frequency of KIT mutations in paediatric solitary mastocytoma is poorly documented.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 19%
Student > Postgraduate 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 48%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Design 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2020.
All research outputs
#13,876,720
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Histopathology
#1,766
of 3,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,807
of 216,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histopathology
#35
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,414 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.