Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is highly prevalent in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and it is a strong predictor of adverse outcomes. We aimed to determine possible echocardiographic parameters to predict the presence of PH in patients with HFpEF.
A total of 113 patients with HFpEF were prospectively enrolled from November 2017 to July 2022. The patients underwent invasive cardiac catheterization and simultaneous echocardiography at rest and during exercise. The parameters indicating right ventricle-pulmonary artery uncoupling, including tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)/pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) and tricuspid annular systolic velocity (TAS')/PASP were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off points of TAPSE/PASP and TAS'/PASP to differentiate patients with HFpEF with PH from those without PH. Sixty-eight patients with HFpEF with PH and 45 without PH were included. Those with PH had lower TAPSE/PASP and TAS'/PASP at rest and during exercise compared with those without PH. Both resting/stress TAPSE/PASP and TAS'/PASP were correlated with rest/exercise pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and mean pulmonary artery pressure. In multivariable regression analysis, TAPSE/PASP remained a significant predictor of exercise pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and mean pulmonary artery pressure. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the optimal cut-off points of TAPSE/PASP and TAS'/PASP to differentiate patients with HFpEF with PH from those without PH were ≤0.62 and ≤0.47, respectively.
Right ventricle-pulmonary artery uncoupling is closely correlated with abnormal rest/exercise hemodynamics (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and mean pulmonary artery pressure) in patients with HFpEF. TAPSE/PASP and TAS'/PASP can be useful parameters to detect PH in patients with HFpEF.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#12,378,465
of 34,547,233 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Heart Association
#6,541
of 11,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,228
of 446,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Heart Association
#189
of 290 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,547,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 290 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
