↓ Skip to main content

症例 釘刺し事故が原因と考えられた化膿性心膜炎,感染性心内膜炎の1剖検例

Overview of attention for article published in Shinzo, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
症例 釘刺し事故が原因と考えられた化膿性心膜炎,感染性心内膜炎の1剖検例
Published in
Shinzo, May 2013
DOI 10.11281/shinzo1969.29.2_155
Authors

杉浦 徹, 成味 純, 宮澤 総介, 宮田 晴夫, 林 淳一郎, 香坂 茂美, 滝浪 實, 原田 幸雄

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2024.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Shinzo
#74
of 159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,090
of 209,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Shinzo
#16
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 159 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.