You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Water quality trade-offs for risk management interventions in a green building
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1039/d3ew00650f |
| Authors |
Sayalee Joshi, Rain Richard, Derek Hogue, James Brown, Molly Cahill, Vishnu Kotta, Kathryn Call, Noah Butzine, Mariana Marcos-Hernández, Jumana Alja'fari, Lee Voth-Gaeddert, Treavor Boyer, Kerry A. Hamilton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Thailand | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 90% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,458,240
of 25,830,005 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
#138
of 870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,309
of 358,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,005 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.