↓ Skip to main content

Mesoporous Pt Nanotubes as a Novel Sensing Platform for Sensitive Detection of Intracellular Hydrogen Peroxide

Overview of attention for article published in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mesoporous Pt Nanotubes as a Novel Sensing Platform for Sensitive Detection of Intracellular Hydrogen Peroxide
Published in
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, October 2015
DOI 10.1021/acsami.5b08146
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Controlling the shape, structure and surface morphology of nanomaterials is of great significance in optimizing sensitivity and catalytic performances in biosensing applications. The main goal of employing Pt-based nanomaterials is to increase their utilization efficiency due to their high cost. Herein, we report the synthesis of mesoporous Pt nanotubes (NTs) using Pluronic P123 as soft templates and Ag nanowires (NWs) with 50 nm in diameter as hard templates. The resultant materials with unique structures show high sensitivity and stability toward H2O2 detection with low cellular cytotoxicity. The high sensitivity and catalytic properties are attributed to the mesopores and hollow structures making the inner Pt surfaces accessible to reaction media and enlarging the total surface area, and one-dimensional (1D) structure facilitating the mass diffusion rate.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 17%
Professor 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 29%
Engineering 3 13%
Materials Science 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,556,890
of 30,202,275 outputs
Outputs from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
#1,947
of 24,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,341
of 300,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
#24
of 332 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,202,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 332 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.