↓ Skip to main content

Molecular pathogenesis of the obligate intracellular bacterium Coxiella burnetii

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Microbiology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
308 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Molecular pathogenesis of the obligate intracellular bacterium Coxiella burnetii
Published in
Nature Reviews Microbiology, June 2013
DOI 10.1038/nrmicro3049
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The agent of Q fever, Coxiella burnetii, is an obligate intracellular bacterium that causes acute and chronic infections. The study of C. burnetii pathogenesis has benefited from two recent fundamental advances: improved genetic tools and the ability to grow the bacterium in extracellular media. In this Review, we describe how these recent advances have improved our understanding of C. burnetii invasion and host cell modulation, including the formation of replication-permissive Coxiella-containing vacuoles. Furthermore, we describe the Dot/Icm (defect in organelle trafficking/intracellular multiplication) system, which is used by C. burnetii to secrete a range of effector proteins into the host cell, and we discuss the role of these effectors in remodelling the host cell.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 293 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 15%
Researcher 45 15%
Student > Master 41 13%
Student > Bachelor 34 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 56 18%
Unknown 63 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 43 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 22 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 5%
Other 29 9%
Unknown 72 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2025.
All research outputs
#2,649,956
of 29,669,692 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#1,037
of 3,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,065
of 219,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#8
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,669,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.