You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical characteristics of SARS-CoV-2-associated encephalopathy in children: Nationwide epidemiological study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Neurological Sciences, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jns.2024.122867 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mariko Kasai, Hiroshi Sakuma, Yuichi Abe, Ichiro Kuki, Yoshihiro Maegaki, Kei Murayama, Yuka Murofushi, Hiroaki Nagase, Masahiro Nishiyama, Akihisa Okumura, Yasunari Sakai, Hiroko Tada, Masashi Mizuguchi, Jun-ichi Takanashi, the Japanese Pediatric Neuro-COVID-19 Study Group, Satoshi Akamine, Pin Fee Chong, Tatsuya Ema, Sayaka Enomoto, Ryohei Fukatsu, Yoshiyuki Hanaoka, Ayuko Igarashi, Tae Ikeda, Kouhei Ishida, Nobutsune Ishikawa, Shinji Itamura, Hideyuki Iwayama, Nanako Kawata, Go Kawano, Kenjiro Kikuchi, Osamu Kobayashi, Hidehito Kondo, Seigo Korematsu, Tsuyoshi Matsuoka, Yuki Minamisawa, Osamu Mitani, Kanako Mizuma, Tatsuo Mori, Shinichiro Morichi, Yoko Moriyama, Mitsuo Motobayashi, Hirotaka Motoi, Kazuhiro Muramatsu, Kazuyuki Nakamura, Tomoyuki Nakazawa, Yutaka Negishi, Yuka Nishizawa, Hiroshi Okada, Kazuo Okanari, Keisuke Oki, Yoshinori Okumura, Taku Omata, Saki Saeki, Fumikazu Sano, Kentaro Sano, Tatsuharu Sato, Takashi Shiihara, Konomi Shimoda, Motomasa Suzuki, Ryuta Tanaka, Chiho Tokorodani, Mitsugu Uematsu, Hiroyuki Yamada, Naohiro Yamamoto, Tatsuya Yamamoto, Haruna Yokoyama |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 126 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 33 | 26% |
| Austria | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 119 | 94% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 3% |
| Scientists | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
| Researcher | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#662,916
of 25,834,578 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Neurological Sciences
#51
of 5,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,426
of 358,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Neurological Sciences
#3
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,834,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.