You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
奄美大島初記録のワモンフグ
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.34583/ichthy.40.0_22 |
| Authors |
是枝 伶旺, 本村 浩之 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2024.
All research outputs
#14,401,869
of 25,163,621 outputs
Outputs from Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan
#69
of 89 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,386
of 183,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,163,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.