You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Molar incisor hypomineralisation: Teaching and assessment across the undergraduate dental curricula in the UK
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ipd.13158 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Judith Humphreys, Anna Graham, Helen D. Rodd, Sondos Albadri, Susan Parekh, Cheryl Somani, Marie Therese Hosey, Greig D. Taylor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 47% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 33% |
| Scientists | 4 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,400,105
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry
#51
of 662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,230
of 352,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them