You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
瀬戸内海の島嶼部におけるベントスの機能群組成と地形的開放度を含む干潟環境の関係性
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Benthology, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.5179/benthos.78.1 |
| Authors |
Yu OKUSAKO, Kohei OKA |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#15,840,332
of 25,853,983 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Benthology
#28
of 46 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,256
of 357,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Benthology
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,853,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one scored the same or higher as 18 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.