You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
'Our Roots Run Deep': Historical Myths as Culturally Evolved Technologies for Coalitional Recruitment.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Behavioral & Brain Sciences, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s0140525x24000013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amine Sijilmassi, Lou Safra, Nicolas Baumard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 29% |
| Sweden | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 25% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Researcher | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 2 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 13% |
| Psychology | 1 | 13% |
| Engineering | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,569,285
of 25,660,026 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral & Brain Sciences
#553
of 2,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,078
of 349,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral & Brain Sciences
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,660,026 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.