↓ Skip to main content

Successful management of hamstring injuries in Australian Rules footballers: two case reports

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Successful management of hamstring injuries in Australian Rules footballers: two case reports
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, April 2005
DOI 10.1186/1746-1340-13-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wayne T Hoskins, Henry P Pollard

Abstract

Hamstring injuries are the most prevalent injury in Australian Rules football. There is a lack of evidence based literature on the treatment, prevention and management of hamstring injuries, although it is agreed that the etiology is complicated and multi-factorial. We present two cases of hamstring injury that had full resolution after spinal manipulation and correction of lumbar-pelvic biomechanics. There was no recurrence through preventative treatment over a twelve and sixteen week period. The use of spinal manipulation for treatment or prevention of hamstring injury has not been documented in sports medicine literature and should be further investigated in prospective randomized controlled trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 105 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 23%
Student > Master 19 17%
Other 7 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Other 24 22%
Unknown 20 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 39%
Sports and Recreations 26 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 12%
Engineering 2 2%
Psychology 1 <1%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 18 17%