↓ Skip to main content

A qualitative exploration of young adult smokers’ responses to novel tobacco warnings

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A qualitative exploration of young adult smokers’ responses to novel tobacco warnings
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-609
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janet Hoek, Anna Hoek-Sims, Philip Gendall

Abstract

Despite reduced smoking among adolescents, smoking prevalence peaks among young adults aged 18-30, many of whom believe themselves exempt from the health risks of smoking shown in warning labels. We explored how young adult smokers perceived warnings featuring proximal risks, and whether these encouraged cessation more effectively than traditional health messages.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Indonesia 1 1%
Unknown 65 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 21 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 16%
Psychology 6 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 30 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,141,103
of 30,058,685 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,759
of 19,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,307
of 218,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#38
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,058,685 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.