↓ Skip to main content

Perceptions of Tree Diseases in Indigenous Communities: Native Alaskan and Hawaiian Insights

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Forestry, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perceptions of Tree Diseases in Indigenous Communities: Native Alaskan and Hawaiian Insights
Published in
Journal of Forestry, January 2024
DOI 10.1093/jofore/fvad053
Authors

Kylle Roy, Susan J Frankel, Lauren E Oakes, Kainana S Francisco, Kekuhi Kealiʻikanakaʻoleohaililani, Rachael A Sitz, Emily S Huff, John Schelhas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,453,078
of 25,196,456 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Forestry
#115
of 405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,417
of 198,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Forestry
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,196,456 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them