↓ Skip to main content

Perspectives on Remote Robotic-Assisted Stroke Treatment: A Commentary Paper

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Neuroradiology, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perspectives on Remote Robotic-Assisted Stroke Treatment: A Commentary Paper
Published in
American Journal of Neuroradiology, January 2024
DOI 10.3174/ajnr.a8085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arturo Consoli, Nicole Mariantonia Cancelliere, Guillaume Charbonnier, Julian Spears, Thomas R Marotta, Vitor Mendes Pereira

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2024.
All research outputs
#16,566,940
of 25,165,154 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#3,726
of 5,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,053
of 176,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#27
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,165,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.