You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Four principles for improved statistical ecology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.14270 |
| Authors |
Gordana Popovic, Tanya Jane Mason, Szymon Marian Drobniak, Tiago André Marques, Joanne Potts, Rocío Joo, Res Altwegg, Carolyn Claire Isabelle Burns, Michael Andrew McCarthy, Alison Johnston, Shinichi Nakagawa, Louise McMillan, Kadambari Devarajan, Patrick Leo Taggart, Alison Wunderlich, Magdalena M. Mair, Juan Andrés Martínez‐Lanfranco, Malgorzata Lagisz, Patrice Pottier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 311 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 36 | 12% |
| United States | 34 | 11% |
| Australia | 14 | 5% |
| Spain | 10 | 3% |
| Brazil | 10 | 3% |
| Germany | 9 | 3% |
| India | 6 | 2% |
| Portugal | 6 | 2% |
| Canada | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 56 | 18% |
| Unknown | 124 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 161 | 52% |
| Scientists | 139 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 153 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 65 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 39 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 35 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 183. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#223,622
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#29
of 2,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,238
of 353,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#1
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.