You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Taxonomic revision of some taxa in Kaempferia subgenus Protanthium (Zingiberaceae) revealing a new species from Thailand and two new synonyms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Blumea - Journal of Plant Taxonomy and Plant Geography, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3767/blumea.2024.69.01.03 |
| Authors |
N. Nopporncharoenkul, T. Jenjittikul |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| India | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,615,651
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from Blumea - Journal of Plant Taxonomy and Plant Geography
#10
of 202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,921
of 354,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blumea - Journal of Plant Taxonomy and Plant Geography
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them