You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Scattered tree death contributes to substantial forest loss in California
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Communications, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41467-024-44991-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yan Cheng, Stefan Oehmcke, Martin Brandt, Lisa Rosenthal, Adrian Das, Anton Vrieling, Sassan Saatchi, Fabien Wagner, Maurice Mugabowindekwe, Wim Verbruggen, Claus Beier, Stéphanie Horion |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 17 | 29% |
France | 3 | 5% |
Canada | 2 | 3% |
Denmark | 2 | 3% |
Spain | 2 | 3% |
Finland | 1 | 2% |
Burkina Faso | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Rwanda | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 28 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 39 | 67% |
Scientists | 16 | 28% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 33% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 5 | 28% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 17% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,168,836
of 25,847,449 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#18,331
of 58,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,340
of 355,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#518
of 2,313 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,847,449 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,313 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.