↓ Skip to main content

散布種子および埋土種子からみたエゾシカ高密度生息地における植生回復の可能性

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Forest Environment, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
散布種子および埋土種子からみたエゾシカ高密度生息地における植生回復の可能性
Published in
Japanese Journal of Forest Environment, April 2017
DOI 10.18922/jjfe.39.2_94
Authors

山口 信一, 矢島 崇, 渋谷 正人, 高橋 邦秀

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Forest Environment
#2
of 25 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,303
of 324,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Forest Environment
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one scored the same or higher as 23 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.