↓ Skip to main content

Optimizing Imputation for Educational Data: Exploring Training Partition and Missing Data Ratios

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Experimental Education, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimizing Imputation for Educational Data: Exploring Training Partition and Missing Data Ratios
Published in
The Journal of Experimental Education, January 2024
DOI 10.1080/00220973.2023.2287447
Authors

Zachary K. Collier, Kamal Chawla, Olushola Soyoye

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,230,136
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Experimental Education
#102
of 291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,768
of 340,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Experimental Education
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.