↓ Skip to main content

Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms ☆

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 2,713)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
78 X users

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms ☆
Published in
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, January 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.11.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anders Wanhainen, Isabelle Van Herzeele, Frederico Bastos Goncalves, Sergi Bellmunt Montoya, Xavier Berard, Jonathan R. Boyle, Mario D’Oria, Carlota F. Prendes, Christos D. Karkos, Arkadiusz Kazimierczak, Mark J.W. Koelemay, Tilo Kölbel, Kevin Mani, Germano Melissano, Janet T. Powell, Santi Trimarchi, Nikolaos Tsilimparis, ESVS Guidelines Committee, George A. Antoniou, Martin Björck, Raphael Coscas, Nuno V. Dias, Philippe Kolh, Sandro Lepidi, Barend M.E. Mees, Timothy A. Resch, Jean Baptiste Ricco, Riikka Tulamo, Christopher P. Twine, Document Reviewers, Daniela Branzan, Stephen W.K. Cheng, Ronald L. Dalman, Florian Dick, Jonathan Golledge, Stephan Haulon, Joost A. van Herwaarden, Nikola S. Ilic, Arkadiusz Jawien, Tara M. Mastracci, Gustavo S. Oderich, Fabio Verzini, Kak Khee Yeung

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 204 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 101 50%
Other 15 7%
Researcher 13 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 5%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 37 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 104 51%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 21%
Arts and Humanities 3 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 38 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#815,302
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
#13
of 2,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,322
of 344,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,713 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.