↓ Skip to main content

Cancer disparities in indigenous Polynesian populations: Māori, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific people

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Oncology, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cancer disparities in indigenous Polynesian populations: Māori, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific people
Published in
Lancet Oncology, May 2008
DOI 10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70127-x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Polynesia consists of several islands that are scattered across a vast triangle in the Pacific, and include New Zealand, Hawaii, and the Pacific islands. There are reported differences in the types of cancer and epidemiologies seen among communities in these islands, the reasons for which are diverse and complex. In this Review, we describe patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and survival in indigenous populations compared with populations of European origin in Polynesia, and highlight the limited available data for Pacific populations. Additionally, we document the current knowledge of the underlying biology of cancers in these populations, and report risk factors that differ between ethnicities, including smoking, viral infections, and obesity. Disparities in measures of health are highlighted, as are evident differences in knowledge of tumour biology and cancer management between majority and minority populations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
New Zealand 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 156 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Other 11 7%
Other 35 22%
Unknown 31 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 9%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 35 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2026.
All research outputs
#4,192,037
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Oncology
#3,320
of 7,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,676
of 129,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Oncology
#16
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.